Bush Vetoes War Funding Bill
Like we didn’t see this coming….
MSNBC and NBC News
Updated: 14 minutes ago
President Bush used his veto pen for only the second time Tuesday after Congress sent him a war spending bill that would impose timelines to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq.
Democratic leaders of Congress staged a festive ceremony Tuesday afternoon at the Capitol to celebrate sending the bill to the president. The White House planned a nationally televised address in response later Tuesday.
At the ceremony, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., accused Bush of putting U.S. troops “in the middle of a civil war” in Iraq.
“After more than four years of a failed policy, it’s time for Iraq to take responsibility for its future,” Reid said. “Today we renew our call to President Bush: There is still time to listen. There is still time to sign this bill and change course in Iraq.”
White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said the president would address the nation at 6:10 p.m. ET, just before the evening television news shows, to explain why he vetoed a bill that would also provide $124 billion in emergency spending.
No withdrawal, Bush promises
The president did not mention the bill in an appearance Tuesday at MacDill Air Force Base near Tampa, Fla., the headquarters of U.S. Central Command, which oversees military operations in the Middle East, including Iraq. But he repeated that any requirement to begin withdrawing troops by Oct. 1 was unacceptable.
Pulling back from Baghdad before the Iraqis are able to defend themselves risks “turning Iraq into a cauldron of chaos,” Bush said. “Our enemy, the enemies of freedom, love chaos.”
The House scheduled a vote to try to override the veto for Wednesday, but Democratic leaders were not expected to have enough Republican support to succeed. Congressional leaders will meet with Bush at the White House on Wednesday to discuss follow-up spending legislation.
Democrats are considering a bill that would fund the troops but still restrict the president’s leeway in Iraq. Senate Republican leaders said they might be open to legislation that would set benchmarks of progress for the Iraqi government to meet.
“There are some types of benchmarks that might well achieve bipartisan support and might actually even conceivably be helpful to the efforts in Iraq,” said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.
But Republicans are reluctant to say whether they support benchmarks with real consequences. Some said they would support tying benchmarks to foreign aid to Iraq totaling more than $5 billion but nothing that would tie the hands of military commanders.
“It depends on what the benchmarks are and what the consequences are,” said Trent Lott of Mississippi, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate. “
Come on, Nancy. You know what to do. Rock those Tina Turner legs and get the Boys on the Hill to override. Imagine the look on Ann Coulter’s face- that should be motivation enough.
Above is me being thrilled at the possibility of an overridden veto, and below that is the Enigma of Evil herself, in a scared stance as she realizes that after enjoying my victory, I will come at her like a spider monkey.
TH



